The day before the March 29th 2005 hearing, I called the Judge's office to inform him that I would not be in attendance. I called to get his fax number so that I may fax this letter to him. His clerk stated that it was best that I attend and bring the letter at that point. Since I did not attend the hearing nor was I successful in getting a hold of the Judge's fax number, I am posting the letter here for the public to read, as it too, offers more about this case and situation. (This website is becoming more like an open diary anyways-seeing as though it is my only thing I can fight with). Here is that letter:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Angela Whitterson

 Judge Dinkelacker

cc: Magistrate Richard A. Bernat

Re:

SK0500256

Plaintiff-ANGELA WHITTERSON

vs.

Defendant-JANET JACKSON

Filed: 3.15.05

Hearing Date: 3.29.05 8:30am

Monday,  March 28^th 2005

Your Honor.

I write this letter in place of my absence regarding the abovementioned hearing date, which was granted by Magistrate Richard A. Bernat on 3.15.05.

As stated in my declaration, oath and petition that I submitted when I filed the civil stalking protection order; the harassment, intimidation, stalking and threats [as orchestrated by] Janet Jackson and her camp are such that I felt it necessary to get the protection order seeing as though I haven’t monetary resources that it would take for me to submit all my (physical) proof and 1400+ paged details of my ordeal with Ms. Jackson and her camp for what is now seven years. I have exhausted all my tangible resources: writing, calling, faxing, emailing and querying various local, state and federal agencies to no avail (as shown on pages 19 and 20 in my declaration, oath and petition that I filed on 3.15.05).

It's so funny to me that I was very successful in getting offers to help with a civil suit against Ms. Jackson and her camp, and what's even more shameful about this so called system that is supposed to protect and serve-is that I've even gotten offers to retain publicists. Hell, I got my first publicity contract offer in 2000-two years into this ordeal. I got my first civil suit offer to retain an attorney in 2001-three years into this.

Let me explain something to you about what this is and what this is not about. This situation is not about my suing Ms. Jackson and publicizing the story, as much as it is about my desperate need to put my life as close back to some semblance of normalcy as possible. The only way I saw this being remotely possible was to get my case heard in the criminal court of law-first. Every state, local, and federal agency "available" to me turned a complete deaf ear to my queries and many refused to even acknowledge that I even wrote them. NEWSFLASH: This is the information age-information superhighway. All (white collar and blue collar) crime does not consist of murder, embezzlement, theft and robbery. My experience over these seven years has taught me that with the right team and monetary resources; you can commit crime from right where you sit without having lay a hand on your target. It is such a shame that this system handled me in the manner that it did simply because it a) involved a lot of reading b) the "alleged" criminal just so happened to be a well-known celebrity. I was minus 2/negative in my corner from the start and because of that-for seven years; I have endured the worst kind of emotional, mental and virtual rape many human beings will never ever experience. I had become so in the habit of doing my very best to accept these things happening to me that, over the years, I'd played the "if you can't beat them-join them" game, I'd make myself learn to accept it as a part of my daily life-such much so, that I never once entertained the thought of it being simply what it was: "harassment, intimidation, stalking and harassment." I just considering it: "tormenting, hurtful, painful and agonizing." It wasn’t until (early March 2005) it was made public that she (Janet) herself filed stalking and harassment charges against someone else that brought it to my attention that a man carrying a big knife (that would have to get past countless bodyguards) ain't got nothing on the torture she has been putting me through. Nothing. It was then, that I became aware that I too, had that civil "right" to file the same charges on she and her camp. I didn’t even acknowledge all the things she'd put me through as harassment and stalking. I've always thought of it as a situation that went from good, to bad to ugly. Simple as that, and when it got ugly, and I exhausted every recourse and way to beg, plead and reason with Janet, I began to seek help from these local, state and federal agencies, who pretty much aided and abetted her-quite frankly. So on March 15, 2005, there I was at your door, with 272 pages of what is actually a 1400+ paged document detailing how things went from good to bad to ugly, only to find on March 17^th 2005, your making public record: (only) the first 25 pages/the declaration, oath and petition portion-even before the March 29^th 2005 hearing date. How'd that happen? From what I was told, if I so much as brought a candy bar wrapper down with the file, it too, is supposed to be scanned as public record. Since when does the courts "block by court order" any documents submitted in an original filing? I will tell you when, when the person on the receiving end just so happened to be a well-known celebrity. That is now minus 3 in my corner, yet again, getting clowned by a legal system that is supposed to protect and serve.

I understand that my submitting all 272 of those pages doesn’t automatically deem Janet and her camp guilty, however, it does one thing that is even greater than your very own decision to grant or deny my civil protection order: let the public be her judge-seeing as though the system has failed me for seven years. Because with or without your granting the protection order, is that going to stop what I've been going through with Janet and her camp? I'll answer your question for you: No. I knew that even when I filed. But at least, with public knowledge of the evil little secret that she has kept from her public, that would at least, spoil the fun that she and her camp involved in this mess has had-playing around in my life. That would at least, alleviate their reveling in the fact that they all have watched and laughed at me Rob Peter to pay Paul and barely make a living and lose everything I've had while trying to fight the likes of somebody like her.

 My reasons for not attending the hearing are most probably in my best interest. And I will have you know that I felt confident and prepared enough to represent myself against the baddest lawyer Janet could possibly pay for-all until the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts neglected to allow me to lean on my backbone: at least the full 272 pages that I submitted in my original file date of March 15, 2005. (I could very well have submitted the 1400+ paged one. I called myself breaking it down and pulling out the most significant portions of the who, what, when, where and how's all involving the harassment, intimidation and stalking techniques as orchestrated by Janet). I understand that a lot of it is bizarre, vulgar and offensive, as is this whole case quite frankly-from beginning to date. But it simply is what is: the truth, nothing but the truth, so help me God-just as I swore in under oath in front of Magistrate Bernat on March 15^th 2005. Just as I swore under oath when I got my 25 paged petition notarized. just as I swore under oath when I filed all the papers at my initial filing.

Contrary to popular belief, this case doesn’t involve 1400+ pages of fragments of a very busy and vivid imagination or some elaborate display of perception that I conjured up into reality and chose Janet Jackson to be a victim of. Every claim that I state is backed up by that very same bizarre, vulgar and offensive truth and fact. And I resent how this system has handled me.

 Obviously, this "situation" with Janet did not start off the way it is now. The book I wrote about it tells of everything that happened from September 1998 through February 2000. The 256 pages (omitted by Hamilton County Clerk of Courts) gives a breakdown of major (harassment, intimidation and stalking) details from March 2000 through October 2004 and the 27-paged declaration, oath and petition (that you left open for the public) summarizes October 2003-February 2005. All those bits of information would have at least made me feel comfortable enough to stand in the middle of your court room and prove my case a whole lot better than a book that details 1998-2000 and a 27-paged declaration, oath and petition that sounds bizarre as hell without having read the remaining 256 that I submitted with it. No way, will I let the system make a complete fool of me by handling me the way that it has for seven whole years only to finally get it publicized and have important parts of my claims omitted from public view-yet expect my po' "nobody" self-stand in front of a court room full of reporters and entertainment public with Janet's high paid lawyers with already pre-planned defense strategies that they have already had on the shelf (for the same seven years that I have been pursuing this) while she and her camp have listened to and watched my every legal pursuit and read every piece of correspondence and file that I have ever written. Hell, the night before I filed the civil protection order (March 14^th 2005), her very own words to me were: "so how'd you like to wake up with all you hair shaved, tied to a tree with stick up your ass?"

She is just as prepared with a defense. None of this is a surprise to she and her camp. They are just as prepared with defensive falsities as I am prepared with offensive truths. Simple as that. The only complexity comes in is my defending my po' lil' "nobody" self (in this civil protection order hearing) against rich big ole "Janet Jackson."

      ·         I could come in with countless emails from people who work for Janet-cursing me out and harassing me to death from 2001-2004.

·         I could even come in with hardcore proof on how ironic it was that while I was searching for an attorney in 2001, how I came across another girl who to, is a victim of Janet and her camps' evil, games and gadgetry. Imagine the hell she is going through, seeing as though Janet had zero interest in her in any way, shape or form. I actually got it good compared to that girl-believe that.

·         I could get real philosophical, creative, theatrical and dig into the psychology and premeditated doctrine behind it all; taking you to where I had to go to investigate her as best as I could too, to come up with her reasons for putting me through all that she put me through by whipping out her 1997 Velvet Rope CD where on Track 12 she records the sound of the dial-up modem connecting to the internet and how on Track 13 she sings her way into a song about a relationship that was cultivated by way of the internet and how this obsession of hers causes much confusion in her mind about whether the love is real and true or an illusion (that's the best way I can summarize it). That there, ought to tell you something right there. Janet and me didn't meet until a whole two years later. When I discovered that, that told me that I was just the right person" at the "right time" who just so happened to play into a fantasy that she entertained so much that she even put it on wax. I was just next up to bat two years later. Check that out.

·         I could put a tape in for you where (between the dates of May 17-31^st 2001) she did what’s called a "Testimony" (interview) on BET television where in "Act Three" they began to show clips of her old song called: "If," while Janet goes into explaining its theme: "If…I love the theme. It’s about this far eastern country and being the only Americans there performing," (then she relates it to what is going on-today in her life-with an almost reflective look in her eye: "It's so weird when you look at it today, it's not that unusual because we have computers where we could, uh, look at the panel-I see you-you see me or we could communicate seeing each other-talk or instant messaging over the net. Um…and that's the way the video was-being able to see someone else in another room and them looking at you and uh…that…flirtatious edge to it. But that's the way that I am, I write about what I'm doing-what's going on in my life." …That was while she was promoting her "All For You" CD in 2001. Speaking of her "All For You" CD.

·         I could point out to you in her song called "When We Ooh" where she speaks about "having conversation through silence lasting all night long."  I could easily point you out to page 282 in the book that I published in 2000/2001 where I talk about how on October 20^th 1999 (to be exact) in the seventh paragraph on page 282-I mention a whole big thing about the two of us having a conversation through silence.

·         I could point out to you on that same "All For You" CD where on Track 2's interlude, she is having a conversation with a girl on there. LoL at the CD being made in 2000 into 2001. Can you tell me how in August 2004 (the night of the live show airing of the Kid's Choice Awards) how I got an hours worth of micro cassette tape recording of that same girl-talking her tail off while we all-she, me and the rest of Janet's buddies were all on the mic together (Janet was in attendance at the awards that night). LoL.

·         I could easily point out to you on her latest CD "DamitaJo," I could have you listen to her reveal while giggling about the "other her" that you don’t know, asking her listeners: "Do you think you know me? Do you think I'm that person that you see on tv?" (or something to that effect).

·         I could even show you how bold and brazen Janet is by showing you emails from one of her co-conspirators that I listed in my declaration, oath and petition letter (that you allowed the public to view). I filed the civil protection order on 3.15.05, and Janet had the girl not only email me the night of 3.19.05. But what was funny is that the girl text messaged me as well. Well, the funny part of it was that I hadn’t spoken with the girl since around June 6^th 2004-she had my old cell phone number. On June 24^th 2004, I switched carriers and got a whole new cell number. I hadn’t even talked to the girl to even give her my new cell number. (Of course Janet has it). But here it is, four days after I filed the civil protection order and Janet and her camp put that poor girl up to do something (I guess to help Janet's "defense" in this) and I sent off her the phone with her tail between her legs when I so boldly said to her: "Janet got you working overtime, but forgetting to keep y'all's stuff air-tight." The girl says: "What? Why you say that?" I then said: "Well, for starters, how'd you get this number?" She then said: "You gave it to me!" I laughed and reminded her: "No dear, I haven’t talked to you since around June 6^th 2004, and I got this number on June 24^th 2004-I never gave you this number nor have I talked to you to give it to you…" She then said: "I hate talking to you." I laughed and responded: "That's what happens when you do things cause you have to and not because you want to-all money aint good money…" She responded: "Bye, I'll call you back." I laughed at all of them.

·         I could easily bring in a nice lil' email (sent to me since my filing the civil protection order sent 3.22.05) from Janet's camp-yelling at me, telling me that Janet went through enough already last year and that my "sick game" wasn’t helpful and that I was being "ignorant and foolish" and they told me: " You know you're the one going to pay her money and proven wrong." Hmm. How bout that one…

To that I say this. If Janet and her camp would agree to pass several polygraph questions I have for each one of them, I welcome Janet to sue me for money I aint even GOT yet and I am willing to let the public make a complete mockery out of me and I will accept all this as "being in my head" and walk away with this considering myself one hell of a genius with a vivid imagination to have written an entire book and 1400+ paged documents detailing all seven years of this. I'll settle for that-but first, ask she and her camp to pass a polygraph. J

Anywho.

·         I could also bring in another email sent to me on 3.25.05 where I was given this big connect the dot lecture and offered some words of advice: "…I wouldn’t light a match during a gas leak."

Quite frankly, I could shut this whole thing down by your merely asking Ms. Jackson if she could answer just ONE polygraph (forget the several questions)-ONE question and in return, we could fold the whole case should she pass it-she'd decline, even if that ONE question would fold this whole case. That ONE question would even be something that she knows, listened to and has seen even since 3.15.05 (the day I filed the civil protection order). God forbid I whip out a list of several questions that only she/her camp would know based on my "claims" of what they know and just how they know them from the entire seven years. They all would decline quite frankly-MISERABLY. They'd NEVER agree to it. NEVER. But don’t you think that any innocent person who is being "falsely accused" of the "bizarre" claims that I am claiming-don’t you think they'd jump at the chance to prove themselves innocent.

At any rate.

 In closing and to all that I say this.

        I felt that my presence is not necessary. I have spoken. Janet has not spoken since 3.17.05 when the public got wind of my filing. I am assuming that she will have her "important people" speak for her-or perhaps she will speak for herself and to that-I step back and am giving her a fair chance to address her rendition or even an apology to her public. Regardless if I am there or not there-or if the order is granted or not, all that has gone on will not stop. Quite frankly, until Janet's resources are handicapped and exposed-it will never stop. The only way to make this stop is the get this case in the federal/criminal court of law where it belongs. This civil protection order is so minute and useless quite frankly. She and her hired help aren’t afraid of something like that. What good is having her ordered 100-500 feet away from me and threatened with assault/jail time should I keep coming up with busted windows and electric meters? I mean, it aint like she herself, is the one actually doing it. And even the person(s) she pays to do it is a pro-anytime they can bust a car window right up under my nose in front of a window where I sat between the hours of 6pm-9pm on a busy residential street. Anytime they can bust an electric meter in broad daylight morning hours of this same busy residential street. I mean, everything she has had done-was done by somebody who knows what they are doing. I've gone through this for seven years-trust me, I have been well-briefed.

         But as for me-my first step with the court system job is done: she no longer has anymore evil little secrets from her public-and what they choose to believe is far from my care. Because I made this my point to she and her camp: that I was not playing with them another year.

I thank Magistrate Bernat for granting the hearing and seeing as though I did get farther in one week than I did in all my seven years fighting this madness; even though he completely humiliated me as I stood there in tears, the office where I filed has enough water cooler gossip to last them a lifetime and the local, state and federal systems have ignored all my cries for help-for the first time in my entire seven year fight-I can at least say that I got something across: the public being her judge-cause I sure as hell haven’t been successful in getting one in the criminal/federal court of law (where this case really belongs)…