For starters, the civil stalking protection order I filed contained a 27-paged oath, declaration and sworn (notarized) petition summarizing my "claims."

Along with those 27 pages, I filed an additional 256 pages that summarized what is actually a 1400 paged case file of damaging proof and details about this mess regarding Janet and her camp and the seven year hell they have been putting me through.

It is evident and clear that the court system (simply because this case involves Janet Jackson-a celebrity) is doing me a great disservice by not allowing her public to read the details that you all need to read in order to determine for yourself whether or not Janet is innocent or guilty in this. It is important for me that her public reads all those 256 pages in order for me to be treated fairly in this, and the court system has no right to block out any papers that I filed during my initial filing date of 3.15.05

Just like I filed the first 27 pages, those 256 were supposed to have been filed with it.

This major omission is not only doing me a complete disservice and injustice, but does a disservice to you-the public as well.

Before you all continue to go assuming that I am some lose cannon on a crusade to ruin Janet's "reputation." Understand that it is obvious that Janet's legal team are having it blocked for a reason: they don't want you to know the truth.

Rationally speaking. Don't you think that if there was no truth to any of this, there would not be a sign that reads: "Case SK0500256 has been expunged or sealed by order of the Court or is an invalid case number. No documents are available. "

Doesn't that tell you something? This is court/public record. All things submitted is fair game (truth or no truth-it's all fair game. This case may very well be about a celebrity, and in that realm of the world, things can and are "blocked" all day long. Since when has is been lawfully right to "block" SKU (stalking) court documents? Even before a hearing date? Since when have you been able to expunge something that hasn't been heard in the court of law yet? I will tell you when: When somebody who is a "nobody" filed papers and details to prove "claims" stating what is true to date: 'That Janet Jackson, Aimee Bruckner, Shawnette Heard, Ricardo Kustner and Louisa Vasquez, (by orchestration of Janet as well), has been stalking, harassing, and intimidating the hell out of me since 1999. The harassment and intimidating picked up heavily in 2001 and has been unbelievably annoying, tiring and exhausting since October 10th 2003-non stop.

This is soooooo unfair to me. And if this case was between myself and anyone else next door, those files would be yours, to view.

Call that number and complain. They have no right to block any of my papers that I filed with my initial filing.

Do not treat this and me as if you know this woman personally. Many of you people (the media and these radio DJ's etc) who are reporting this madness that you are reporting, only know that woman's face on television. You people do not know her. You do not know the kinds of people she associates with, what they are into and what they are all about. Y'all do not know that. Get a hold of that 256 pages and you will find how-that is one thing for certain and two for sure...

How can a bunch of grown adults speak so sure about this being a case made up by some weirdo claiming that big ole Janet Jackson is stalking her little ole nobody self? How can you do that? How can you speak so sure that that is the case when you don't know the details. How can you do that when you haven't at least read the book? How can you? How can you simply report: "Well, um, a woman claims that she is being stalked and harassed by Janet Jackson. The case was thrown out." Pleaseeeee get your facts straight before you go on television reporting untruths and half-truths, when there is no need for that, when the (now blocked courts documents) clearly states that there is a hearing on March 29th 2005.

Allow me to clear the air for the public regarding the falsity that you are reporting.

If you manage to get a hold of the (27-paged/pdf filed), page 26 of the (now sealed documents), in the last paragraph of my sworn statement; you will see where I stated:  "I am seeking the court's interception and am therefore submitting the details for all my claims along with the petition for civil stalking protection order and am asking that it be enforced." I THEN said: "If I could be sure that I would be treated with the same respect that I am more than sure that the judge will give to the celebrity respondent, I would ask the court to issue an ex parte (emergency) protection, which would allow me a hearing in front of a judge. Considering the fact that I have not retained (a prosecuting) attorney as yet, I do not feel as though I will be treated with the equal respect since I do not have designer lawyers that the respondent has. Until then, I feel that all enclosed in the document is enough to let her public be her judge. I am confident that taking this step (I was talking about the initial filing) is enough to let the respondent (Janet) know that I am serious about my desire to get she and her camp dealt with in the federal court of law.

For your information-the many of you who reported your half-truths, when I went to file the 272 paged document, I elected not to file the exparte (emergency) form because I did not want to be in front of some disrespectful judge talking down at me, without my having me represented by an attorney.

When I turned in the 272 pages of proof, facts truths and details, the official told me that I had to fill out the exparte' (emergency request) or else my case could not be filed at all. He in turn, filled out the exparte himself and told me to sign it and wait to see this judge (who I already predicted-as shown, two paragraphs up) would be disrespectful.

Well, for you all who misreported the story, the judge did not "throw it out," the judge merely denied the emergency ex parte (for emergency/right now protection) and granted me a hearing.

If he would have "thrown it out" (as you so quickly reported), he would not have granted the hearing, "throwing it out" would have been nothing for him to see 272 pages of details in my hand and him telling me to haul ass. But instead, he told me that he would be denying the emergency request for protection-that I did not elect to file anyways, and then he gave me a court date for March 29th 2005.

How could those of you who reported what you did, not only jump on your celebritydrom, mind-controlled bandwagon and immediately penalize me when for starters, you haven't even read the book OR the entire 27 pages even, before you are so quick to judge and adlib the half-truths that you reported, just to keep people tuned into your shows? How could you?

This situation is very upsetting to me that I was forced to even go this route, that Janet and her camp forced me to, only for this to increase her declining name, fame and popularity.

My filing this was a last resort. I have been fighting this and putting up with Janet and her camp so long that I didn't even acknowledge it as simply what it is: stalking, harassing and intimidation. I've fought and dealt with it so long that it has been like waking up with it as a part of my just as much as you routinely wake, brush, wash and eat. That's what it has been like for me. You people have NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO idea what she and this has been putting me through. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO idea.

This situation goes wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy back from the secret little mystery behind the breakup of Janet and her "longtime boyfriend" Rene. Y'all don't know the half.

If you got a hold of the book and you have read the (now sealed 27-paged document) and the 256 (sealed) pages, all of your questions will certainly be answered.

I will not allow any of the media public to sit me-Angela Whitterson out there like some weirdo eccentric writer who wrote a book and now "suing Janet Jackson" to garner attention to sell a book.

I will not let any of you put me out there to look that way: the media, the public, or some cornball lamebrain whose mind and limits don't extend any further than the bits and pieces if mis"information" being handed over to you.

Nobody's going to put me out there to look like some damned nut-I'm not having that: for breakfast, lunch or dinner-hell no. I'm sorry. You can cancel that.

So, until ANY of you (who misreported that garbage) have read the book and have had access to these sealed 256 pages, it is best that you put a lid on it, because now the reading public knows the true happenings thus far in addition to your half-truths and assumptions. What they choose to believe is totally not my concern or care.