Janet was a no-show and sent no one to represent her...

I was a no-show and sent no one to represent me.

Therefore, the stalking and harassment case was dismissed.

Why did I not go?

Well, I have a couple of reasons, but the main one was my disappointment at the public not having access to the 256 pages. I felt that with the public having access to the book (which gives all details from Sept. 1998 through February 2000) along with the 27 pages PLUS the "sealed" 256 pages, that would have given you enough to gage whether or not I was telling the truth or no. (Seeing as though the public is ultimately going to be her judge).

Regardless whether or not I went to the hearing, there is no guarantee that the harassing, intimidation and stalking would stop anyways. But I did feel that at least if the public had access to all that I was prepared to defend on the March 29th, 2005 hearing date; half of my battle (explanation of the details) would be won in this.

There is no way in hell that I was going to spend hours explaining what could have been in your hands ahead of time about something as bizarre and complex as this situation.

At least if the public had access to the files the 27 PLUS the 256 (which as of April 2005 are now BOTH sealed), along with the book-my explaining the situation would have been cut in half.

When (on March 28th, 2005-the day before the hearing) I called to ask why is it that the 256 pages were blocked, I was told: "we try to be fair to all parties involved..."

Hmmm. Interesting. I thought that if someone files harassing/stalking charges and they so much as included a candy bar wrapper with the initial filing, it too is supposed to be scanned until at least the hearing date, at which the respondent/defendant (in this case: Janet or her attorneys), is to come and defend her "rendition."

I never knew that initial filing papers could be: "blocked by court order." I thought everything filed at an initial filing was public record-unless of course you're Janet...

That said, I feel like a major part of my goal was accomplished: getting it out to her public-something I was unable to do in the whole seven years I have been fighting this. So even though the courts did me a complete injustice and disservice by not allowing the public read all the files, they did do one thing: put it in the hands of her public to be her judge...

Now.

You have my reason my I did not go to court or send someone for me-now ask Janet this question: "so why didn't you?"

...She (in her mind) would most probably tell her weirdo fanatics, lambs and disciples to kiss her ass and mind your business, but would respond to you with some publicist/lawyer/manager-designed response.

Thank you (sincerely) to all those who remained objective and weren't so quick to judge me and defend her honor simply because you know her from television. The ones who did judge me must feel real STUPID because Janet didn't even defend herself).

So to all those Janet's weirdo fanatics, over-zealous fans, lambs and disciples who were so quick to judge me: kiss my ass and mind you business. Yep I said it. Get a life. Quit thinking that because you are merely a fanatic that you really know and have some connection with these celebrities.

   

 

 

BACK HOME 

http://ww.angelawhitterson.com ©2000, 2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008, 2009  

1) ABOUT THIS BOOK  

2)  UNDERSTANDING THIS BOOK

3) Note to the public from Angela, regarding this Janet case (entered 3.17.05)

4) The "hearing" March 29th 2005...(entered 3.30.05)

5) The letter that never reached the Judge  (entered 3.31.05)

6) Angela's "closing statements" (entered 3.31.05)

7) Janet gets 283-paged harassment/stalking files sealed from public view (entered 4.7.05)

8) This whole thing is about me " trying to publicize [my] book." You're kidding right? (entered 4.7.05)

9) From Angela to her close acquaintances (to be continued...)